Medicine Hat Menus | SA Jobline | Subscribe
Online Paper Login
Advertisement

Advertisement

NEWS
Front Page
Top Stories
Local News
National News
World News
Business
Obituaries
Gone but not forgotten
TV Listings
Agriculture
Travel
Technology
Kaptoons
Photo Gallery
Chat Rooms
Recipe of the Day
Junior Reporter
Kinsmen Auction
VIDEOS
National
Sports
Health & Wellness
ENTERTAINMENT
Local Entertainment
National Entertainment
THE EDGE
LIVING
Local Living
Health & Wellness
Home & Garden
Special Occasions
SPORTS
Local Sports
National Sports
CLASSIFIEDS
Classifed Ads
Place an Ad
Careers
SA Jobline
Real Estate Guide
COMMENTARY
Opinion
Letters to Editor
Send a letter to Editor
Ticked & Tickled
Polls
Blog
Advertisement

SERVICES
Contact Us
Online Paper
Other Publications
Login
Subscribe
Other Links
Paper Archives
NIE
Online Advertising
Send us your news
Progress
Lottery results
Gas Prices
Login
Online Paper subscribers click here to view the paper
Print E-mail

 

Not illegal Speech
Medicine Hat, Comments 08/14/08
Winnipeg Free Press

The article, in question, is based on a false premise, that Canadians HAVE Freedom of Speech.

The Charter of Rights limits any free speech to that which can be justified and lawful. It states, in part:

That it is”…subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.” It also says: Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: a) freedom of conscience and religion; b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication; c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and             d) freedom of association

 

The problem is that Canadians have none of these freedoms. A freedom cannot be limited. If it is, then it is not freedom. If we have Freedom of Speech, why are individuals charged for spreading so-called hate literature or a message of “hate”? Who says it is hate? Why should any speech be limited? And if this church is prevented from expressing their belief, who will be next? Just ask Ezra Levant who was charges by the Alberta Human Rights Commission for spreading hateful pictures in his defunct magazine, spent over $100,000 dollars to defend himself and only after 900 days of persecution, was finally exonerated. In the article, the writer states that MP Pat Martin and the Public Safety department “has concluded” that the churches message is “hate speech”. That may be their opinion, but it is not fact, justified and affirmed by a court of law. No one has been charged and proven guilty for anything that has or may have been said. On that basis, the churches views and expressions are just as justified as anyone else’s. If you don’t like their views, you have the opportunity to express them to the church. However, the problem is that your view will be acceptable, while theirs are not. So you will try to stop their Freedom of Expression, by classifying it as hate, or obnoxious, or intolerant, thereby trying to limit their ability to communicate their honestly held beliefs, while you carry on your Freedom to express yours. What makes your freedom more valuable than theirs? Free Speech, in Canada, is an oxy-moron. Terrance LeBlanc

 

 
   
 




Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Facebook!Slashdot!StumbleUpon!Spurl!Newsvine!Furl!Yahoo!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!

Users' Comments  RSS feed comment
 

Average user rating

 

No comment posted

Add your comment



mXcomment 1.0.6 © 2007-2008 - visualclinic.fr
License Creative Commons - Some rights reserved
Friday, 15 August 2008

 
< Prev   Next >
Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Copyright © December 04, 2008 All material,programming and design contained herein is copyrighted by The Medicine Hat News, a division of Alberta Newspaper Group inc. All Rights Reserved. This website powered by: TriCube Media