Medicine Hat Menus | SA Jobline | Subscribe
Online Paper Login
Advertisement

Advertisement

NEWS
Front Page
Top Stories
Local News
National News
World News
Business
Obituaries
Gone but not forgotten
TV Listings
Agriculture
Travel
Technology
Kaptoons
Photo Gallery
Chat Rooms
Recipe of the Day
Junior Reporter
Kinsmen Auction
VIDEOS
National
Sports
Health & Wellness
ENTERTAINMENT
Local Entertainment
National Entertainment
THE EDGE
LIVING
Local Living
Health & Wellness
Home & Garden
Special Occasions
SPORTS
Local Sports
National Sports
CLASSIFIEDS
Classifed Ads
Place an Ad
Careers
SA Jobline
Real Estate Guide
COMMENTARY
Opinion
Letters to Editor
Send a letter to Editor
Ticked & Tickled
Polls
Blog
Advertisement

SERVICES
Contact Us
Online Paper
Other Publications
Login
Subscribe
Other Links
Paper Archives
NIE
Online Advertising
Send us your news
Progress
Lottery results
Gas Prices
Login
Online Paper subscribers click here to view the paper
Accountability needed in gas utility business Print E-mail

There have been two instances in the past year when the City’s Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Labas, has given ratepayers the same disturbing speech. 

The first was when the Gas Utility under-estimated the cost of servicing gas wells by more than a million dollars. This miscalculation evoked the famous “Uh-oh” proclamation from then alderman Bill Cocks. The most recent is the City’s potential loss of up to $8 million in a gas marketing business failure.

This latest loss is drawing public criticism but perhaps for the wrong reason. It may not be a question of mismanagement, but it is almost certainly Mr. Labas’s perceived arrogance in rationalizing large financial losses.

 His refrain goes something like this. “Yes, we’ve lost money. However, don’t forget how many millions the Gas Utility contributes to the Medicine Hat Advantage!” This argument is lost on those of us who have trouble with monthly bank statements. A loss is a loss. And, as another writer correctly notes, the lost money means less for important City projects.

The COO’s argument appears to belittle these losses as “small potatoes” or as inevitabilities in a big business like the Gas Utility. It’s not the message that residents want to hear. What we want to hear is accountability.

In the gas well servicing schmozzle, a bureaucratic error occurred. The budget line provided for only one gas well to be serviced when a whole field was in need.  Errors occur.  Human institutions are fallible. Admit the mistake and move on.  

In the gas marketing mess, residents have to realize that there are costs and risks to owning a “business.” Losses are part of the game. Mr. Labas explained this, then trotted out the argument that the loss is not significant when compared to the tremendous profits from the Gas Utility. Well, for the ordinary resident, $8 million is significant. Do not expect residents to ignore the dark side by constantly looking on the sunny side. 

 A little humility is in order. Humility, not blame. In future, Mr. Labas, try this clear, simple, message: “It is ‘regretful’ that we have lost money. If it is possible, here is how we will avoid the same situation in the future.”  That’s all we want to hear. That is accountability.

Les Pearson

Medicine Hat





Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Facebook!Slashdot!StumbleUpon!Spurl!Newsvine!Furl!Yahoo!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!

Users' Comments  RSS feed comment
 

Average user rating

 

Display 1 of 1 comments

1. 19-08-2008 09:04

Time for a employment review
!Kudos to Les Pearson - as it does seem to be a matter of "arrogance" and lack of accountability on M. Labas's part. As then alderman Bill Cocks pointed out after the first $1 Million dollar mistake - this would mean that heads would role if it had happened in any other City Department. The "old boys club" that has dominated City Hall has an Achilles heel - and I wonder just how long they will prop up Mr. Labas and his little fiefdom built on inflated ego and perceived power.
Registered

Display 1 of 1 comments

Add your comment



mXcomment 1.0.6 © 2007-2008 - visualclinic.fr
License Creative Commons - Some rights reserved
Monday, 18 August 2008

 
< Prev   Next >
Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Copyright © December 04, 2008 All material,programming and design contained herein is copyrighted by The Medicine Hat News, a division of Alberta Newspaper Group inc. All Rights Reserved. This website powered by: TriCube Media